WGU healthcare programs: every class linked
Choose the exact program, see its complete standard path, then open any class by WGU code. This is the program → class → verified assessment hierarchy, adapted to WGU's competency model and public-source limits.
Every nonzero course row in these 8 program grids has a live class page. CCN identities remain on the same code page, standard-path terms stay visible, and task identities remain held unless WGU publishes a real rubric.
Use the map without turning CUs into weeks
Select the program shown on the Degree Plan, then use its term grid as a sequence map. Transfer credit and mentor planning can change the individual route. A competency-unit value is not a duration, and a term position is not a universal due date; only the live Degree Plan and Course of Study establish the registered path and assessment instrument.
Each class page contains a rubric-or-competency planning method, evidence and data guidance, professional boundaries, and links back to every selected program that uses the code. Where WGU has publicly verified a real PA, the class page links one assessment manual. Where it has not, the course page says so directly.
Bachelors programs
| Program | Catalog CUs | Linked classes |
|---|---|---|
| Bachelor of Science, Health Information Management | 122 | 36 |
| Bachelor of Science, Health and Human Services | 111 | 35 |
| Bachelor of Science, Health Science | 91 | 28 |
| Bachelor of Science in Psychology | 106 | 34 |
| Bachelor of Science, Public Health | 104 | 33 |
Masters programs
| Program | Catalog CUs | Linked classes |
|---|---|---|
| Master of Healthcare Administration | 31 | 10 |
| Master of Public Health | 36 | 12 |
Certificate programs
| Program | Catalog CUs | Linked classes |
|---|---|---|
| AI Fundamentals in Healthcare Certificate | 5 | 2 |
The operating method across a six-month term
Build a term board from the live Degree Plan: one row per course, current instrument, dependencies, target date, and next action. Keep written performance work and objective-assessment preparation in separate lanes. Rubric aspects drive PA sections; preassessment evidence drives OA study and scheduling.
Acceleration is useful only when it protects learning and accuracy. Resolve instrument and template questions before drafting, front-load field or external constraints, maintain one evidence and decision ledger across related courses, and never let a promised calendar replace the student's actual Degree Plan.
Make the program-to-class handoff explicit
Start on the exact program page because similarly named WGU paths can carry different codes, CUs, bridge requirements, or professional constraints. Copy the next live code from the Degree Plan, confirm the title and CCN identity where one is shown, and then open that class page. The class layer explains how to convert the current instrument into a work plan; it does not presume that a title, CU value, or catalog term proves a particular PA or OA.
For performance work, create a rubric ledger before drafting. Give each aspect a destination, evidence source, success test, and final check. For objective work, create a competency ledger from the current Course of Study and preassessment, then use retrieval practice and worked scenarios until weak areas improve consistently. Keep those lanes separate: prose written for a hypothetical task is not useful OA preparation, and generic study notes do not prove a PA rubric aspect.
Carry forward only verified decisions. A program-wide ledger may preserve an approved population definition, business assumption, data source, privacy rule, stakeholder boundary, or evaluator correction. It should never preserve copied prose or quietly reuse an old assignment specification. When a later class changes the audience, measure, method, policy, or template, record the change and update every dependent artifact.
Applied courses add a third lane. Clinical, field, simulation, employer, and capstone requirements depend on real participation and truthful records. Put placement, approval, hours, access, signatures, and submission-channel checks ahead of drafting. Tutoring can prepare the reasoning and review de-identified writing; it cannot replace the student's experience, professional judgment, authenticated exam, or final submission.